Hi Terry, Could you just represent the data as you naturally/intuitively would? I'd be interested to know what's natural/intuitive for you.
David Terry Catapano wrote: > David, > > I could provide you with an exhibit of species descriptions in which > the species should be grouped under genera. How should the > hierarchical facets be represented in the JSON data? > > /Terry > > On Dec 8, 2007 6:35 PM, David Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Mark Feblowitz wrote: >> >>> I strongly second this. Simple facets push all such natural >>> hierarchies into much less natural property structures. I suspect >>> many of us would appreciate some kind of hierarchical representation of >>> facets. >>> >>> >> Let's work together on this: If you could provide me with an exhibit >> with data in need of hierarchical facets and tell me how such facets >> should work, then I'll try to implement it. It's always better to work >> with realistic data. >> >> >>> While we're waiting, are there any good examples out there of using >>> properties as a surrogate to facet structuring? >>> >>> >> I'm not sure what you meant... Could you explain? >> >> David >> >> _______________________________________________ >> General mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
