The 2008 SPARQL recommendation definitely doesn't support COUNT and I don't think it supports MIN, MAX or what you would think of as a SQL style GROUP BY.
David Huynh wrote: > Right now server-side Backstage formulates its queries to the > triple store by putting together Sesame "query algebra trees". If SPARQL > is as expressive as Sesame's query algebra (supporting GROUP, COUNT, > MIN, MAX), then it shouldn't be hard to swap in a SPARQL end point > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
