Joseph Kesselman wrote:
> 
> Of these, I think I like the separate JARfile solutions better than the
> experimental package approach, with the "default" being the most recent
> recommendation (DOM2) if one absolutely must be built into the "tool" JARs
> for convenience.

So are you saying you prefer the following option?

  + Optimize for #2 (less code duplication)
    + cp = dom2.jar sax2.jar jaxp.jar xerces.jar xalan.jar
    + cp = dom3.jar sax2.jar jaxp.jar xerces.jar xalan.jar
      where only dom2 contains DOM L2, jaxp.jar contains javax.xml.*,
      etc.

-Edwin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to