DISCLAIMER: before people start jumping up and down about what I wrote,
please consider the text found in those layouts a simple 'filling'. I
could have used "blah blah", but I wanted to get a *real* feeling of the
amount of words required to create simple yet effective description of
each single effort.
I repeat: there is *NOTHING* final in those words and it is not
appropriate, at this point, to patch/comment/suggest or otherwise change
those words since *very* little effort was provided to end up with that
text.
In the future, that page will be automatically composed out of
descriptions that will be edited and maintained by each single
subproject independently and autonomously.
For now, consider it as the usual 'blah blah' to fill up the graphical
space.
Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano
>
> --On Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2002 01:44 +0100 Stefano Mazzocchi
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Why would you want a wider category than parsing? It seems to me that
> >> an XML parser is the most basic piece of software a developer would
> >> understand and would be a natural division.
> >
> > I was trying to make xml-security fit without making a category for
> > 'parsers' and 'security'.
>
> Well, about the "XML Security" sub project:
>
> It _USES_ Xerces and Xalan, XML Signature _PERORMS_ Transformations and it
> will _BE_USED_ by the applications which you have in the Services section.
> Funny to sort ;-)))
Ok, thanks for pointing this out.
What is your suggestion?
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
