Kimbro Staken wrote: > > BTW, -1 to the whole idea. The issue raised was legal and easily solved by > simply better detailing the source of the included jars.
That addresses the issue for most, but not all jars. As an example: http://www.webgain.com/products/java_cc/usage.html . Take a look at the last time in particular. Pretty clear, eh? There are a number of licenses out there that contain restrictions or requirements that trigger on distribution. The GPL and Sun's Binary Code License are two. For those jars, we need to either (1) find alternatives, (2) work with the license holder, or (3) require each developer to obtain the code themselves. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
