Alas, this doesn't work in Windows environments....

> -----Original Message-----
> From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: version numbers in jars
> 
> 
> >Oh, I misunderstood what you were wanting.
> >
> >A big -1 to naming all jars with version #s.  I can't think of 
> >a bigger pain in the keister than having to revamp my 
> >classpath settings every time a library revs.
> 
> Easy, just use symlinks :)
> 
> ln -s /usr/share/java/log4j-1.1.3.jar /usr/share/java/log4j.jar 
> 
> log4j 1.2 is out :
> 
> rm -f usr/share/java/log4j.jar 
> ln -s /usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.jar /usr/share/java/log4j.jar 
> 
> Apps will use in CLASSPATH /usr/share/java/log4j.jar :)
> 
> >I could see heading down a road where all the Apache jars do 
> >programatic(sp?) version information the same way, but I would 
> >rather not make that via the filename.
> 
> For example exolab use this naming :
> 
> castor-0.9.3.9.jar
> tyrex-0.9.7.0.jar 
> ...
> 
>   
>  
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> In case of troubles, e-mail:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to