Andy Clark wrote:

I don't see any problem with have a PMC that deals with all
Xerces implementations but still considering the different
implementations "projects" with their own sub-projects. For
example, Xerces-J could have an HTML sub-project with the
HTML DOM implementation and an HTML parser built from the
Xerces framework. But the draft charter was explicit about
defining a sub-project as an XML parser implementation in a
particular language.

The board resolution I proposed described Xerces as charged with responsibility for the "creation and maintenance of open-source software related to XML parsers".


So I would imagine the notion of sub-elements of code within the TLP would be just as high level. A sub-project would simply be a section of code with a community that looked at some element of XML parsing.

Does that make sense? (Is XML parsing too confined?)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to