Neil Graham wrote:
The idea of subprojects being simultaneously projects with their own
subprojects looks like a terminal terminological disaster to me. :)
That's because you keep referring to Xerces-J as a sub-project.
I see Xerces-J as "The Xerces Project in Java".
Perhaps what we need to get beyond this is the concept of products that
Robert was mentioning exist in other Apache projects. If we said that the
given parser subprojects might have multiple products, where products could
include parsers and components closely tied to parsing, would that solve
the problem?
Not really. Although the term "product" is a little clearer in
that it refers to a shipped entity. Perhaps it would be easier
to start by defining what we want to ship and then work backwards
from there.
--
Andy Clark * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
