--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to push the XML Graphics Commons idea again > and therefore would > like to know what people think. > > 1. I think there's noone around opposing the idea of > creating the common > area and making the transcoders in FOP available to > the Batik team, is > there? >
No problem with making the transcoders available to the Batik team (or even giving them to that project, for that matter.) > 2. Do you prefer the transfer of the transcoders to > the Batik subproject > as Thomas suggested or do you think that the > transcoders should be in a > separate area that is easily accessible by both > teams? Or is that > particular question not so important for you? > Not so important for me, as I don't work on the transcoders. > 3. Would you be opposed to converting Batik and FOP > to Subversion in > preparation for the creation of the common area? > This would preserve all > history of the individual classes. Time frame: > within 1 month from now. > It seems to me that the infrastructure have > succeeded in making > Subversion stable now. > Either way is again fine with me, as long as Batik is OK with it. I note that Jakarta Struts has also moved over to Subversion, while Tomcat is apparently choosing to remain with CVS for the forseeable future. Thanks, Glen --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
