Sorry to be unclear... At some point, the decision was made to stop
referring to AWT when talking about FOP's 2-dimensional screen & print
renderer. Instead we started referring to it as "Java2D" which I agree
is much more concise & descriptive. However, there may be some who
think of it as AWT, and I think at the top level, we should refer to it
as Java2D (formerly FOP's AWT renderer). I don't think we should go
CRAZY with this, and *always* reference it that way, but there needs to
be somewhere on the site (and in the code?) that relates the two.
On Aug 8, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Sorry, Clay, but I don't understand what you mean. I'm feeling stupid.
On 08.08.2005 18:31:10 The Web Maestro wrote:
The only thing that strikes me, is that Java2D doesn't say (make
reference or include any info to help searchers find it--e.g.,
formerly
AWT). Apolgies for the delay, I'm moving the house, office, and
servers
this month...
Regards,
Web Maestro Clay
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - <http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/>
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
