On 11.08.2005 22:40:25 J.Pietschmann wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > I can check in the excalibur-framework variant, if you like? :-) > > Better, but still not perfect. You know, bad karma burns and all that. > Claiming to be a framework solving big problems just doesn't match > with still being a fringe product after putting heroic effort in it > for quite a few years.
I know. That was tongue-in-cheek. > > Would talking to the Excalibur > > people about extracting the configuration package into a separate JAR be > > an acceptable solution? > > Nice idea. Perhaps republishing as "jakarta commons configuration > light" might help in getting out of the collateral damage radius of > Avalon. :-/ :-\ :-/ Hehe. I wonder how much the guys from Commons Configuration would like that name. Ok so, if there are additional voices that I should pursue this I can. I've got enough other things on my task list to be happy not to have to do this. After all, I don't really want this. It's just a possible way out of this. So if anybody wants to take the lead here, I'd be VERY VERY thankful. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
