Hi Libia, It is puzzling to me that the table browser would give incorrect results for genes with large UTRs. Can you please send me an example of one that you found and describe what is incorrect about it?
Thank you, Mary --------------------- Mary Goldman UCSC Bioinformatics Group On 12/14/10 5:53 PM, Libia Pava wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having trouble with getting accurate untranslated regions with the table > browsing option. I have used two approaches, and have trouble with both. I > have used the BED table option, and have picked either 3 or 5 UTR, yet I'm > unable to know which gene corresponds to each region (no way to have the > symbols). > I have also tried to do it manually by using the "selected fields from > primary and related tables" output getting the 3' UTR from thick start to > cod start and the 5' UTR from thick end to cod end. By doing this, I have > found that some of the genes with larger UT regions are not correct and I > don't know why. I was wondering if there was any way I could accurately get > the UT regions of both the 3' and the 5', and also know which gene it > correlates to by indicating the gene symbol. > > I don't know if the system has a glitch,because about 95% of the UT regions > are correct by the method I'm using, the only ones that are not correct are > the ones that are very large. > > Thank you!! > > Libia Pava > _______________________________________________ > Genome maillist - [email protected] > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome > _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
