Hi Stephan, thanks for the suggestions/feedback. I have logged the below as feature request. We'll definitely look into this.
Thanks, -- Greg Roe UCSC Genome Browser On 1/3/11 6:18 AM, Stephan Struckmann wrote: > Hello, > > writing an article [1] that stresses the advantages of publicly available > annotation data, especially wiki-style approaches, we agree with one of the > reviewers, that there is a need to have categories for wiki track entries. > Having categories, wiki entries could be marked e. g. as regulation related > (TFBS data), as gene related (TSS, ...), or as expression data. Because the > list of necessary categories probably will increase in future, maybe even the > categories should be open for community changes. > > * So, what I would like to propose is to add a category field to the wiki > track. Then, researches could manage the wiki entries, even if their number > heavily increases. > > * Additionally, we think, a possibility to extend the list of categories > should be given to the community. > > We appreciate the availability of wiki tracks in the field of open access > research very much, and I love the usability of the UCSC genome browser, so I > would be glad to contribute a small piece. > > I hope, that you can take account of our proposals, > > > > Thank you and a Happy new year, > > Stephan Struckmann > > Universities of Rostock and of Greifswald, Germany > > > > [1] Fuellen, Struckmann: "Evolution of gene regulation of pluripotency - the > case for wiki tracks at genome browsers" (Pubmed 21190561), Biology Direct > 2011 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Stephan Struckmann > IBIMA Universitätsklinikum Rostock > [email protected] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Genome maillist - [email protected] > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
