On 31-01-2015 16:07:41 +0100, Michael Weiser wrote: > So my guess is that when prefix was working on 10.4 PPC, much more stuff > was used from the system directly, such as crt1.o. Perhaps even > gcc-4.0.1 was still in use.
My iMac G5 died 2 years ago, and I ran 10.4 on it back then. Never upgraded it to anything newer. We didn't use csu for a long time, until I understood why Kito had added the package. I remember updating CSU a couple of times, so the latest version very well may not be compatible with PPC/10.4. We could/should mask it. > Is someone currently actually using prefix on OS X 10.4 PPC and can help > me out? Unfortunately not that I know, but I can try the best I can. I used to have access to 10.5/PPC, but that no longer is the case either, unfortunately. > Rationale: 10.4 is the ultimate benchmark for self-containedness of > prefix because loads of stuff the tools in the prefix need just don't > exist in the system yet. It got me on to clang always using the system's > libstdc++ for example because that produces warnings because of a > mismatching libgcc_s from the prefix. I'd be nice if you have the time to try, because I remember it took ages to compile gcc-apple... :( -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
