Hi Fabian, On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 05:03:11PM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> upgraded it to anything newer. We didn't use csu for a long time, until > I understood why Kito had added the package. I remember updating CSU a I'm feeling a bit sense here: The system compiler and linker were able to produce a first gcc-apple-4.2.1. Now that one isn't able to compile itself. I copied over crt1.o from the system for a try and that didn't change anything either. There's something really fishy going on there. I'll try to investigate. > couple of times, so the latest version very well may not be compatible > with PPC/10.4. We could/should mask it. There's only csu-79 in the tree. I'll try to do a bit of downgrading on that. > > Rationale: 10.4 is the ultimate benchmark for self-containedness of > > prefix because loads of stuff the tools in the prefix need just don't > I'd be nice if you have the time to try, because I remember it took ages > to compile gcc-apple... :( Yep, it's quite the slowcoach. But it gets there eventually. :) -- tschoe, Michael weiser.dinsnail.net/
