I would be very interested to check if somebody could benchmark if this does not hurt the memory access performance.
Celestica is quite adamant that it will (but it is out of opteron business, so its opinion may be old) > Miguel Filipe posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > excerpted below, on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:50:55 +0100: > > > Just for the record, I'm not having the problem anymore. > > The BIOS had a option to go around the memory hole, by software, or > > by hardware (only for rev ? cpus).. I chose by software.. and worked.. > > now I have: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> free -m > > total used free shared buffers cached > > Mem: 8037 8000 36 0 0 3625 > > -/+ buffers/cache: 4375 3661 > > Swap: 11452 0 11452 > > Very good to read, not only for you, but because I'm looking to upgrade, > but haven't yet, and now I know it'll work properly when I do. > > -- > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in > http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html > > -- > [email protected] mailing list -- Dmitri Pogosyan Department of Physics Associate Professor University of Alberta tel 1-780-492-2150 412 Avadh Bhatia Physics Labs fax 1-780-492-0714 Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J1, CANADA -- [email protected] mailing list
