LOL! That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get upset if memcpy does strange things. :)
On 7/23/05, Matt Randolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, and I take no responsibility for any damages to anyone or anything > arising from the use of the revised memcpy.c or software produced from > it. It may contain further errors that I don't know about. > > Matt Randolph wrote: > > > There is a bug in the original memcpy.c that will cause a segfault if > > you don't pass it any parameters. Here is a fixed version. I've left > > everything else alone (except for a spelling correction). > > > > -- > "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" - W. of O. > > -- > [email protected] mailing list > > -- [email protected] mailing list
