On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 01:10:15PM -0700, Bob Young wrote:
> Analogies suck, software isn't a car, or a house, or anything else, it's
> software. If you can't make you're point without analogies, maybe you
> haven't thought it through clearly enough.
Heh. Analogies are beyond your grasp, eh? I kinda doubt it, sir. I
have to admit I have never before run across anyone who thinks
analogies suck. Maybe it is a sign of the weakness of your arguments
that they can't survive a good analogy. Personally, I like analogies,
and I bet even a simple google of your email history would show more
than a few analogies from you. I doubt very much you are so shallow
as to hate analogies, and I doubt just as much that you'd now refute
whatever analogies you have used in support of your own arguments.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
--
[email protected] mailing list
