On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 21:04 +0200, Bardur Arantsson wrote: > I can't be bothered to open up a bug report, but I've attached a trivial > patch.
... > I think the logic in there still looks suspect though: AFAICT there may > be other scenarios than the one I accidentally tried where 'unpack' may > remain True while unpack_cmd does not get set to anything meaningful. > With my patch this will result in the new error message as well -- I'm > not sure how appropriate that is. > > Anyway, the patch certainly certainly shouldn't cause any regressions. > The new message only triggers when an undefined variable would be > accessed anyway. I'll have to test it. It sure would be nice if there were a bug report for this so that I didn't lose this email in all of my pre-release hustle. Maybe I'll happen to remember this email when I get to doing catalyst testing again. Who knows... -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
