Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 21:04 +0200, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
I can't be bothered to open up a bug report, but I've attached a trivial
patch.
...
I think the logic in there still looks suspect though: AFAICT there may
be other scenarios than the one I accidentally tried where 'unpack' may
remain True while unpack_cmd does not get set to anything meaningful.
With my patch this will result in the new error message as well -- I'm
not sure how appropriate that is.
Anyway, the patch certainly certainly shouldn't cause any regressions.
The new message only triggers when an undefined variable would be
accessed anyway.
I'll have to test it. It sure would be nice if there were a bug report
for this so that I didn't lose this email in all of my pre-release
hustle. Maybe I'll happen to remember this email when I get to doing
catalyst testing again. Who knows...
Paste
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-catalyst%40lists.gentoo.org/msg00395.html
into your TODO file.
--
Bardur Arantsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- You'll get more with a kind word and a 2x4" than with just a
kind word.
Marcus Cole
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
