That's my whole point, you do not help people, you just give the illusion of security, as of when you get caught the system does not protect anymore, then the very purpose of your supposed protection falls apart.
Most people will think they are safe with encryption as in the contrary, it is just asking for investigation and visibility! You expose the user rather than protecting him. so what's the point doing an encryption layer? to hide ~/.firefox or /etc/init.d/tor ? Do you think you actually help the lil' chinese that looks for using TOR? I do not think so at all! Using your software he *will* get tortured if he stays silent. Hence he won't use it! It's nice to implement features and I show much respect for that, but you need a design in the back, a purpose, something strong and stable that is lacking here. Is it worth? How can I break my system? all those questions you don't seem to have an answer..as there is. Add a legal dimension to your design and you're screwed man! Or maybe is it the computer hype, anywhere we put some encryption sounds sooooo l3333t? I do not know but this does *not* make any sense at all! but hey that's my 2 cent HO <troll> ok I'm off, dui! </troll> ps: and ohh yeah you do not seem afraid of going to jail, you look like a tough man, lucky you! Thanks for reading On 7/1/07, Nelson Batalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All of your points were already addressed. Besides, if you're afraid to go to jail in the EU/US, then that's your problem, I'm looking to help people from theft (or hacking for the livecd testing), and maybe some rare opressed citizens looking for an extra layer of security. He can still use steganography in files inside, provide the key of the system to the goverment and keep his identity safe on the root. All the other cases only need to enjoy the easiness of having all the system encrypted, which no steganography implementation can provide. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
