On 06/27/2011 05:55 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 06/27/2011 05:58 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> We use 2.0.6.916 on official releng releases. >> I tried 9999 on my private tests because [..] > > To me that leaves the question who uses 9999 for serious stuff at all. > In case it's no one (which we should find out) we could trash that > branch and fully concentrate on calalyst_2. > > I guess that sounds a bit radical at first. It doesn't have to be a > quick decision. Also, version control allows us to bring it back if needed. > > Ideas on find out who is using 9999: > > - Removing 9999 ebuild from the tree and see who's complaining > > - Resetting branch master to nothing but a README announcing > the possible death of that thread and a request to join > this mailing list and speak up about it if there is need. > > - Asking on one/some/all of gentoo-dev, gentoo-user, gentoo forums, > planet gentoo. > > After such action I imagine a time window of 2 to 4 weeks to give people > a chance to react. > > What do you think? > > >> I can confirm that the build with the master branch fails as it doesn't >> seem able to find the spec files or doesn't accept them - the official >> ones we use to build weekly releases. > > That seems to further decrease the chance that someone is using 9999 for > real to me.
One week has passed by. Anyone? Sebastian
