On 07/04/2011 02:10 AM, Matt Turner wrote: >>>> We use 2.0.6.916 on official releng releases. >>>> I tried 9999 on my private tests because [..] >>> >>> To me that leaves the question who uses 9999 for serious stuff at all. >>> In case it's no one (which we should find out) we could trash that >>> branch and fully concentrate on calalyst_2. >>> >>> I guess that sounds a bit radical at first. It doesn't have to be a >>> quick decision. Also, version control allows us to bring it back if needed. >>> >>> Ideas on find out who is using 9999: >>> >>> - Removing 9999 ebuild from the tree and see who's complaining >>> >>> - Resetting branch master to nothing but a README announcing >>> the possible death of that thread and a request to join >>> this mailing list and speak up about it if there is need. >>> >>> - Asking on one/some/all of gentoo-dev, gentoo-user, gentoo forums, >>> planet gentoo. >>> >>> After such action I imagine a time window of 2 to 4 weeks to give people >>> a chance to react. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> >>>> I can confirm that the build with the master branch fails as it doesn't >>>> seem able to find the spec files or doesn't accept them - the official >>>> ones we use to build weekly releases. >>> >>> That seems to further decrease the chance that someone is using 9999 for >>> real to me. >> >> One week has passed by. Anyone? > > I'm perfectly fine with the change, especially after the graphviz > dependency of asciidoc was made optional.
Please re-read the text above. It's not about asciidoc. I'll make a new thread. Best, Sebastian
