On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:18:15AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: > W. Trevor King wrote: > > > My above idea of copying /etc/localtime into the chroot during > > > chroot_setup and either just removing it or replacing it with a > > > file from an optional to-be-added spec file parameter seems like it > > > would work - how do people feel about that? > > > > FWIW, I'd prefer an early-acting root_overlay analog. > .. > > if we've missed timezones, we're probably missing something else ;) > > It's not a bad idea, but OTOH copying /etc/localtime and just > removing it again needs no new parameter and would be quite a > simple patch.
But then why not just copy over the portage tree too, instead of going through the snapshot procedure? I think the point of catalyst is to isolate the final tarballs/ISOs from the host system used to build them. Otherwise we could skip stages and catalyst, building the tarballs in a simple chroot. -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
