W. Trevor King wrote: > > It's not a bad idea, but OTOH copying /etc/localtime and just > > removing it again needs no new parameter and would be quite a > > simple patch. > > But then why not just copy over the portage tree too, instead of > going through the snapshot procedure?
As it happens, I have a patch which implements that. > I think the point of catalyst is to isolate the final tarballs/ISOs > from the host system used to build them. Otherwise we could skip > stages and catalyst, building the tarballs in a simple chroot. Yes and no. For timezone and resolv.conf that doesn't make sense. //Peter
pgpsWfBp9AN2h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
