On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:30:40PM -0800, Brian Dolbec wrote: > My aim for now is to debug the hell out of it, to stabilize all the > existing changes, BEFORE doing a ton more changes. That will also give > me more experience in how catalyst is used, possibly ideas how to change > it for the better. I'll fix the doc's generation and make a setup.py > and new 9999 ebuild.
I'm not suggesting additional changes on top of yours, I'm suggesting new ones underneath yours, or alternatives to your current series. It seems a shame to spend time testing a work in progress, since you'll probably want to re-test the final form before merging. I'm trying to help polish your series down before we invest a lot of time testing. > Plus I need to focus more on another project needed for the git tree > migration. I have no problem waiting on the catalyst front if it helps push the Git migration through. I've been wishing for that for a while :D. Instead of making my suggested changes on top of your series, I can also make them underneath your series, and help rebase your series on top. That gets the changes I want in, and lets you focus on other things at the same time ;). I'm also ok with just waiting until folks have more time (e.g. the catalyst-spec man page cooked for five months ;). Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
