On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 19:22 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > So from talking on IRC, it seems that the problem that led to this > patch was that a binpkg of gcc linked against an old mpc was used > during stage1, leading to a broken gcc in stage2. Stripping --usepkg > makes sense for this purpose. > > Removing --buildpkg I'm not sure about. It seems to me that anything > that is built during the seed-update should be okay to use for the > stage1. >
Yeah, I thought it should be ok too, but so far opted to leave it out I thought I'd wait for more feedback. That's also why I cc'd Zac, since I didn't know if he was on this list. > Adding an option for updating @system still seems unnecessary. > If everyone wants it nuked, is easy todo :)
