On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:30 AM, W. Trevor King <[email protected]> wrote: > It would also have been nice if we'd > caught the s/;/:/ typo in 462348d during ML review, but I didn't.
It would, yes, but it's expected that patches sent to the mailing list have actually been tested. Doing otherwise (and not stating so) is inexcusable. This has happened a number of times already.
