On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:32:14PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > It may be a good idea to make this patch depend on your other > patchset which fixes up some of the documentation and adding more > detailed documentation....unless you already did that and I'm not > paying attention.
That's a good idea. I'd be happy to rebase either series on top of the other to flesh out the documentation, but I think I'll wait until after one of them lands in master. This fix and the warning message series seem fairly distinct to me, and having smaller patch series seems easier to review. If anyone out there is thinking “I would definately merge this stuff if it was all in one big series instead of scattered about in topic branches”, please tell me ;). I can certainly do that if y'all prefer. Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
