On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 06:56 -0800, Dylan Baker wrote: > On Friday, December 13, 2013 10:21:20 PM Brian Dolbec wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 21:14 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Brian Dolbec <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > - print "Using command line specified Catalyst > > > > configuration file, "+myconfig + print "Using > > > > command line specified Catalyst configuration file, "+\> > > > No need to add \ > > > > > > (same comment applies elsewhere) > > > > General rule is if you are making something multiline, it needs to be > > enclosed in ()'s or []'s, etc.. I'm quite certain that the old print > > statement needs the line continuation "\" symbol since there are no ()'s > > enclosing all blocks to be printed. That may have changed at some point > > so that it is not required in more recent python versions. Actually > > when using the newer python() you don't even need to use + between > > blocks of text on multiple lines. > > You are perfectly free to use () with the print keyword in python 2.x
That is also a py3 compatibility change. So I WAS trying to keep that
separate and done after the main mess was cleaned up.
{and can everyone try to do list replies only, we don't need multiple
copies of the same mail}
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
