On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 06:54 -0800, Dylan Baker wrote:
> On Friday, December 13, 2013 07:07:15 PM Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > ---
> >  modules/generic_stage_target.py | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/modules/generic_stage_target.py
> > b/modules/generic_stage_target.py index 342c65b..1fbc733 100644
> > --- a/modules/generic_stage_target.py
> > +++ b/modules/generic_stage_target.py
> > @@ -1066,9 +1066,9 @@ class generic_stage_target(generic_target):
> >                                             "/use will cause portage to 
> > ignore"
> >                                     print "\tpackage.use in the profile and 
> > portage_confdir. 
> You've been
> > warned!"
> > 
> > -                   myf.write('PORTDIR="/usr/portage"\n')
> > -                   myf.write('DISTDIR="${PORTDIR}/distfiles"\n')
> > -                   myf.write('PKGDIR="${PORTDIR}/packages"\n')
> > +                   myf.write('PORTDIR="%s"\n' % self.settings['portdir'])
> > +                   myf.write('DISTDIR="%s"\n' % self.settings['distdir'])
> > +                   myf.write('PKGDIR="%s"\n' % self.settings['packagedir'])
> 
> what is the point of this? These produce exactly the same output, except the 
> previous is more readable.
> 
Sure it is more readable in that one spot. BUT...
The point is the entire reason for the whole re-write I started in the
first place.  Removing hard coded paths scattered throughout the code.
Putting them in one easily modified and maintainable place. 

> > 
> >                     """ Setup the portage overlay """
> >                     if "portage_overlay" in self.settings:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to