On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 06:56:23PM -0800, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 14:24 -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > > + "port_tmpdir": "/var/tmp/portage", > > But, isn't this ridiculous. I was even chastised before for adding > something that wasn't used right away. I consequently had to rebase > it away.
Sure. I don't think we use settings['port_tmpdir'] in this part of
the series though. I can shift this commit back to the next phase if
folks think that's appropriate.
> - self.mounts = ["proc", "dev", "distdir",
> "/var/tmp/portage"]
> + self.mounts = ["proc", "dev", "distdir",
> "port_tmpdir"]
> self.mountmap = {"proc":"/proc", "dev":"/dev",
> "/dev/pts":"/dev/pts",\
> -
> "distdir":self.settings["distdir"],"/var/tmp/portage":"tmpfs"}
> + "distdir":self.settings["distdir"],
> "port_tmpdir":"tmpfs"}
This is changing the *mountmap key* to port_tmpdir, but it's not
changing the *mount target*. I'm not sure where that happens, maybe
it's automatically extracted from settings using the mountmap key?
Cheers,
Trevor
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
