On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 08:17 +0100, Uwe Thiem wrote: > On 21 July 2006 04:26, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > > Duncan wrote: > > > I don't see it as... annoying; I see it as... challenging! =8^) > > > > > > Seriously, computing is my hobby, and as such, it needs to remain a bit > > > challenging from time to time, or it would cease to be of interest. > > > > Just out of curiosity, are there three "versions" -- stable, testing and > > unstable -- or just two -- stable and unstable? > > Three.
Umm... what's the other KEYWORDS set, then? I know of 3 actual sets, but they're different than you think. arch - stable ~arch - package is stable, but the ebuilds needs testing -arch - package is known not to work on this architecture Beyond that, there is package.mask, which is supposed to be used for any packages that have had only limited testing, shown poor stability, or have unresolved security problems. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
