On Воскресенье 04 января 2009 20:14:57 Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to raise this, and it should possibly be an issue we discuss at > the next meeting. Should all live ebuilds default to +kdeprefix? > > Personally I think they should. Anyone wanting an all -kdeprefix system > can set -kdeprefix in their make.conf, and those of us keeping a stable > in -kdeprefix, and a live in +kdeprefix can continue to do this. > > When I originally committed the eclass changes to the default for live > ebuilds this was the case. It was since changed without any discussion. > I think the previous behaviour represents the most flexible approach for > our user and development community. > > Is there a flaw in this logic? As far as I can see anyone wanting the > current behaviour can add a line to their make.conf, the old behaviour > is impossible to reproduce now without maintaining a patched > kde4-base.eclass. > > Thanks, > > Marcus Personaly I think that all kde-base live ebuilds should be in +kdeprefix while misc packages susch as amarok and so on could be both +kdeprefix and - kdeprefix Also I think that misc packages could be installed with snapshots or even stable kde -- Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov Gentoo Team Ru
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
