-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi.
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > Alexey Shvetsov wrote: >> On Воскресенье 04 января 2009 20:14:57 Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wanted to raise this, and it should possibly be an issue we discuss at >>> the next meeting. Should all live ebuilds default to +kdeprefix? >>> >>> Personally I think they should. Anyone wanting an all -kdeprefix system >>> can set -kdeprefix in their make.conf, and those of us keeping a stable >>> in -kdeprefix, and a live in +kdeprefix can continue to do this. >>> >>> When I originally committed the eclass changes to the default for live >>> ebuilds this was the case. It was since changed without any discussion. >>> I think the previous behaviour represents the most flexible approach for >>> our user and development community. >>> >>> Is there a flaw in this logic? As far as I can see anyone wanting the >>> current behaviour can add a line to their make.conf, the old behaviour >>> is impossible to reproduce now without maintaining a patched >>> kde4-base.eclass. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Marcus >>> >> Personaly I think that all kde-base live ebuilds should be in +kdeprefix >> while >> misc packages susch as amarok and so on could be both +kdeprefix and - >> kdeprefix >> Also I think that misc packages could be installed with snapshots or even >> stable kde >> > You didn't address the main question I was posing - should live ebuilds > of misc packages default to +kdeprefix? I think they should and see no > reason for not doing this. It allows people to maintain a live/stable > system using -/+kdeprefix respectively if they want to. If they want > everything installed in /usr they can explicitly set -kdeprefix. I agree with cryos that all live ebuilds should be +kdeprefix. For all those that think otherwise, I would like to hear how you plan to handle the collisions with non-live ebuilds. > You bring up several other points but I am not sure they all need > considering at the same time... > > Thanks, > > Marcus > - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklhNSgACgkQcAWygvVEyAIpogCeIr9Lu2JQNLnZWcgxDdXzoVh/ XZAAmwX7DfI9EMtHjOzqkyi1eDrgZNrt =nNjO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
