On Tuesday 21 September 2010 12:19:42 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On 21-09-2010 09:02, Ladislav Laska wrote: > > Hello again, > > > > as we are discussing trinity in our overlay, it is clear we will need > > some infrastructure. What am I thinking > > If trinity has any chance of becoming an alternative DE with upstream > support, new development and the security holes are fixed, it could > become a new option for Gentoo and thus use our official infrastructure. > Until it reaches a point it can be put back in the tree (we'll have to > find maintainers for it), and given it has become a fork (do they want > to develop in a completely new direction or are they planning to look / > follow / track kde4?), the best hosting solution is probably a new > overlay for it. > You can use Gentoo bugzilla to track issues with the overlay and you can > keep using this ML. > It would probably help quite a bit if you could either find a current > Gentoo developer interested in trinity or if some of you would apply to > become Gentoo developers[1]. > > [1] - > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/recruiters/default-recruiters-email.tx > t
+1 to what Jorge said, and moreover: - As a Gentoo Developer, I'd be happy to mentor - As a KDE Team member and responsible for the kde4-guide doc, I can help with docs (put refferences to TDE and help you write a new guide) - As an overlays member, a new trinity/tde overlay is acceptable, send a mail to [email protected] to ask for one (name/description/owner/committers) - As a fdo project member, no need to create a new ml or host your own. This is a low activity ml, i don't find any reason to create another low activity one for the same target group. Any KDE4 user may want to have a look to TDE and file bugs / questions about it. -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
