On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 21-09-2010 09:02, Ladislav Laska wrote: >> Hello again, >> >> as we are discussing trinity in our overlay, it is clear we will need >> some infrastructure. What am I thinking > > If trinity has any chance of becoming an alternative DE with upstream > support, new development and the security holes are fixed, it could > become a new option for Gentoo and thus use our official infrastructure.
Seems that way. Currently there is a lot of work in progress. They are mostly bugfixes, but also some new features (haven't seen the whole list) > Until it reaches a point it can be put back in the tree (we'll have to > find maintainers for it), and given it has become a fork (do they want > to develop in a completely new direction or are they planning to look / > follow / track kde4?), the best hosting solution is probably a new > overlay for it. They want to follow kde3 tracks. I guess that qualifies for "a new direction". Do you think new overlay is better way to go? I was thinking, that some of our ebuilds would have to be duplicated (qt3 is one of them), but I can see there are benefits from new overlay... > You can use Gentoo bugzilla to track issues with the overlay and you can > keep using this ML. As I recall, the reason we're not using bugzilla is, that we don't have full access to it and without it it's kinda crude. > It would probably help quite a bit if you could either find a current > Gentoo developer interested in trinity or if some of you would apply to > become Gentoo developers[1]. That would probably solve our bugzilla issue. > >> Website & documentation - possibly for new users, some users may >> choose to use trinity insted of kde4/gnome/*, and they will seek some >> documentation, howtos. This could be possibly wiki. >> Bugzilla - users should be able to report bugs, which may or may not >> be upstream bugs. It would be easier if we could track them in better >> way than remembergin status for each one of them >> Mailing list - Gentoo-desktop is great, but I'm afraid that we would >> create too much noise on official mailing list. >> >> These are only suggestions, but I think they are good ones. If we >> decide to implement them, I can host (and possibly maintain) at least >> wiki & bugzilla. I don't have a mail server running, but mailing list >> should not be a problem too. However, I don't have experience in >> maintaining bugzillas and mailing lists, so some more experienced >> developer may be able to be more efficient. >> >> Regards Ladislav Laska >> S pozdravem Ladislav Laska >> --- >> xmpp/jabber: [email protected] > > [1] - > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/recruiters/default-recruiters-email.txt > > - -- > Regards, > > Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org > Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMmHiuAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPu7kP/A4e/mF30Le57abjT4A8Ad2v > wdKuAKr0J+gIzkITO0iRKq2ShLVCQtpN1EvFtpobTlV1gPca7DSm4dwWGSao3vQN > yICUXvOGuloi9XKcO/+EnzadaFHdHlduqc5o27YRXtmETgzRIlsWxsbWFX2pmY/u > 2l1AN7FYyhrjxd7KRcLhtbm4Q/UkAzYQRBUyYq1sAFPotkBEZXZLYEhfrfcLNonj > rTU6ERG9Kx0JNv6q46NiOaLuU8xXgGG93uKtl3b8LX5JTlW1+daFjwGGE6QeP9QL > 80Om+JkCrVv+Fwr3V97yWkzfjm4mKoJ4tpDBps3VOI31Utmwn42sTlxaBE5Qhai+ > xxFShNd7X0NY0FiCYslBqVS0erdfX+6OGvOtqs7vYmaNGDibMBwzwS1AvSUSSoB4 > 1Mcw7D8ALzpW7PXlkolAiKWCS0xT9ltyh7lqMufxNBqrYBghNCYySWkhUHR/pmeg > lRaHcrxP8GsEaC/a811e0dFbd37jaFNzm5xTlEfBZDWrDVERhRg9CoqtPlWlbSKi > 6yipGKN4Wiv+/DAp9n43N8FDmUwc15HvZt5Q7DPX37RJEmdhSGltAw+h3yYemZtE > s3fdX1swcNwqmiU3hYHdFGgA6Du3xMU7vH0++CkWBpioteih+ofotBeF8aXkn47L > mK5IHajm/BLb7F7Vc4Ru > =cYf7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
