On Wednesday 12 November 2003 14:18, Paul de Vrieze wrote:

> > With that in mind, why is there a /var? use /tmp ;-)
>
> Because /tmp is for shortlived temporary files. /var is for files that
> can be regenerated, but that regeneration is allowed to be expensive. 

That description applies to /var/cache. but not all of /var.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-5.5.html

/var isnt only for things that can be regenerated. The content of /var/mail in 
particular is irreplaceable.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-5.1.html

> tmp must not contain such caches. On /tmp one is able to run a tmp
> reaper, on /var it would be less than desirable.

Agreed

-- 
Toby Dickenson


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to