On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Brad Laue wrote: > On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 07:40, Ferris McCormick wrote: > > This wasn't quite what I had in mind when I asked how you wanted to > > address an apparent problem with mozilla & garbage: > > (I understand these are probably unrelated problems: mozilla+garbage & > > mozilla-stable-ebuild removed, but I can't resist suggesting a > > conspiracy...:-) .) > > As vapier stated, the ebuild was removed because it is old. It is the > responsibility of each architecture maintainer to keep the mozilla > versions up to date. > Not to beat a dead horse, but how can an ebuild that was marked stable for ia64 four days ago suddenly become obsolete??? That's a pretty short life span.
> I have asked repeatedly that people do this, as I do not have IA64, > SPARC, AMD64 or PowerPC systems available to me on which I can build and > test Mozilla out. > > The userbase can help their respective architectures out by stating that > a specific version of Mozilla is serviceable on theirs, and ask to have > it marked 'arch' on their particular CPU type. > > Brad > > -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone: (703) 392-0303 Fax: (703) 392-0401 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
