Why not good old version numbers? Maybe start at 1.5 if what would be Gentoo 2004 were earthshattering enough to warrant that, then just do 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.3, etc etc until there is another earth-shattering change like portage-ng maybe?
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 01:37, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 03:10, Matt Thrailkill wrote: > > A couple things: > > Versions named by year? Thats always been a pet peeve I had with other > > programs... is this now set in stone for Gentoo? > > Do you have a better suggestion? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
