On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 13:33, Robert Cole wrote: > Someone in this thread said that ACCEPT_KEYWORDS isn't for unstable > ebuilds/packages. If that's the case we don't need ACCEPT_KEYWORDS do we? I > must have it wrong that things go from masked to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS to the > stable tree route. I'll do more reading and educate myself as to what > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is for and why apps are flagged that way.
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is for testing *ebuilds* not for testing packages. A packages stability/lack thereof has little to do with its KEYWORDS. Yes, there are many packages in the tree which would be considered "unstable", such as the beta KDE or the development-sources, but those are generally left unsupported and usually there for the benefit of the project/authors. -- Chris Gianelloni Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team Is your power animal a pengiun?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
