gentoo-dev  

Messages by Date

• 2005/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.2 Thomas Heinrichsdobler
• 2005/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.2 Stuart Herbert
• 2005/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.2 Ferris McCormick
• 2005/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.2 Lars Weiler
• 2005/02/11 Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.2 Carlos Silva
• 2005/02/11 [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.2 Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords Hasan Khalil
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for Mac OS X Project Goals for 2005 Stroller
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for Mac OS X Project Goals for 2005 Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Caleb Tennis
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Roman Gaufman
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Caleb Tennis
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Peter Johanson
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Roman Gaufman
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for Mac OS X Project Goals for 2005 Francesco Riosa
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Stephen P. Becker
• 2005/02/10 [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Roman Gaufman
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Ioannis Aslanidis
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Ned Ludd
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Roman Gaufman
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Thierry Carrez
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for Mac OS X Project Goals for 2005 Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/10 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for Mac OS X Project Goals for 2005 Hasan Khalil
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] usage of EXTRA_ECONF EXTRA_EINSTALL Brian Jackson
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Ioannis Aslanidis
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Ioannis Aslanidis
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-4 support in Gentoo Jeremy Huddleston
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Stuart Herbert
• 2005/02/10 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Ioannis Aslanidis
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Brian Beattie
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Prozilla needs a new daddy / herd (or an undertaker) Roman Gaufman
• 2005/02/09 [gentoo-dev] aclocal cruft cleaning Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Aaron Walker
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Georgi Georgiev
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Tuan Van
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Stefan Sperling
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Robin H. Johnson
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Stefan Sperling
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory James Dio
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory James Dio
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Stefan Sperling
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory purslow
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Allen Parker
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
• 2005/02/09 [gentoo-dev] Re: usage of EXTRA_ECONF EXTRA_EINSTALL Torsten Veller
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Robin H. Johnson
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] usage of EXTRA_ECONF EXTRA_EINSTALL Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] usage of EXTRA_ECONF EXTRA_EINSTALL Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Aaron Walker
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Lance Albertson
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Dan Meltzer
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Michael Kohl
• 2005/02/09 [gentoo-dev] usage of EXTRA_ECONF EXTRA_EINSTALL Torsten Veller
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Marc Hildebrand
• 2005/02/09 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory purslow
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Robin H. Johnson
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Marius Mauch
• 2005/02/08 [gentoo-dev] Automatic stabilization of packages Yaron Tausky
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory John Hampton
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Allen Parker
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Peter Johanson
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Kumba
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Francesco Riosa
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Marius Mauch
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Andrew D. Fant
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Francesco Riosa
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Ned Ludd
• 2005/02/08 [gentoo-dev] Vim gentoo-syntax becoming mandatory Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Maurice van der Pot
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Brian Friday
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Maurice van der Pot
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Renat Golubchyk
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Ned Ludd
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Renat Golubchyk
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Alec Warner
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Tom Martin
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Fabian Zeindl
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/08 [gentoo-dev] gentoo-release Fabian Zeindl
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Say hi to the new guy :) Simon Stelling
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] Say hi to the new guy :) José Alberto Suárez López
• 2005/02/08 [gentoo-dev] Say hi to the new guy :) Omer Cohen
• 2005/02/08 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change Martin Schlemmer
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] What does invalid preprocessing directive #warn mean? Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Patrick Kursawe
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change Patrick Kursawe
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11 minimal build size [WAS] virtualx eclass change [u] Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/07 [gentoo-dev] What does invalid preprocessing directive #warn mean? Mike Flippin
• 2005/02/07 [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords Duncan
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change [u] Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords Hasan Khalil
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Fernando Serboncini
• 2005/02/07 [gentoo-dev] Xfce 3 removal Brad Cowan
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Simon Stelling
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Marius Mauch
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Simon Stelling
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/07 [gentoo-dev] Remove no<insert feature here> USE-flags from the tree Michiel de Bruijne
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] should we close bugs? Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change [u] Martin Schlemmer
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] should we close bugs? kang
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change Fernando Serboncini
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change Fernando Serboncini
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Foundation proposed bylaws Daniel Armyr
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change [u] Martin Schlemmer [c]
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Vicente García Diez
• 2005/02/07 [gentoo-dev] Re: KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Duncan
• 2005/02/07 [gentoo-dev] Re: virtualx eclass change Duncan
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Alin Dobre
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change Patrick Kursawe
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Vicente García Diez
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Generating metadata for overelays Georgi Georgiev
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change Fernando Serboncini
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] should we close bugs? Dylan Carlson
• 2005/02/07 [gentoo-dev] virtualx eclass change Patrick Kursawe
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Foundation proposed bylaws Sven Vermeulen
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Michiel de Bruijne
• 2005/02/07 [gentoo-dev] KDE-3.4.0_beta2 Roman Gaufman
• 2005/02/07 Re: [gentoo-dev] Generating metadata for overelays Nicholas Jones
• 2005/02/06 [gentoo-dev] Generating metadata for overelays Georgi Georgiev
• 2005/02/06 [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords Daniel Ahlberg
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] should we close bugs? Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] should we close bugs? Drake Wyrm
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] should we close bugs? Wolfram Schlich
• 2005/02/06 [gentoo-dev] eutils.eclass: get_number_of_jobs() Mike Frysinger
• 2005/02/06 [gentoo-dev] should we close bugs? Marius Mauch
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] GWN independence? [u] Martin Schlemmer [c]
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Foundation proposed bylaws Daniel Armyr
• 2005/02/06 [gentoo-dev] Re: GWN independence? Duncan
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Foundation proposed bylaws Grant Goodyear
• 2005/02/06 [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-sparc] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 status --- last(?) symlink issue? Duncan
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] GWN independence? Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] GWN independence? Tom Martin
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] GWN independence? Simon Stelling
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] GWN independence? Robin H. Johnson
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] GWN independence? Stuart Herbert
• 2005/02/06 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Foundation proposed bylaws Daniel Armyr
• 2005/02/05 [gentoo-dev] GWN independence? Grant Goodyear
• 2005/02/05 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-sparc] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 status --- last(?) symlink issue? Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/05 Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Andreas Pokorny (apokorny) Andrej Kacian
• 2005/02/05 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-sparc] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 status --- last(?) symlink issue? Henrik Brix Andersen
• 2005/02/05 [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-sparc] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 status --- last(?) symlink issue? Duncan
• 2005/02/05 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Maintaining production systems - and losing ebuilds Andrew D. Fant
• 2005/02/05 [gentoo-dev] Re: Maintaining production systems - and losing ebuilds Ron OHara
• 2005/02/05 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Foundation proposed bylaws Sven Vermeulen
• 2005/02/05 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: distfiles mirroring tool Michael Kohl
• 2005/02/05 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-sparc] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 status --- last(?) symlink issue? Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/05 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-sparc] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 status --- last(?) symlink issue? Jeremy Huddleston
• 2005/02/05 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-sparc] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 status --- last(?) symlink issue? Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/05 [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-sparc] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 status --- last(?) symlink issue? Jeremy Huddleston
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] Re: distfiles mirroring tool Duncan
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] Re: xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 Duncan
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] media-gfx/babygimp Fernando Serboncini
• 2005/02/04 Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Foundation proposed bylaws Daniel Armyr
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 sparc32 install, more on orphan links. Ferris McCormick
• 2005/02/04 Re: [gentoo-dev] distfiles mirroring tool Nicholas Jones
• 2005/02/04 Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 19 / gentoo-server Lance Albertson
• 2005/02/04 Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 19 / gentoo-server Olivier Crête
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] GLEP 19 / gentoo-server Benjamin A. Collins
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] distfiles mirroring tool Vitaly Ivanov
• 2005/02/04 Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 Chris Gianelloni
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 Duncan
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] One more "last final" xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 installation note Ferris McCormick
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.904 status --- last(?) symlink issue? Ferris McCormick
• 2005/02/04 Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugday reminder! Donnie Berkholz
• 2005/02/04 [gentoo-dev] Bugday reminder! Bryan Østergaard
• 2005/02/04 Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Andreas Pokorny (apokorny) Andreas Pokorny
• 2005/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper if/else blocks in bash Anthony Gorecki
• 2005/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-4 support in Gentoo Daniel Goller
• 2005/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper if/else blocks in bash Ciaran McCreesh
• 2005/02/03 Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper if/else blocks in bash Olivier Crête

• Earlier messages
• Later messages