On Tuesday 03 February 2004 07:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:38:07PM +0200, Dan Armak wrote: > 2. Guaranteed someone will "clean" an ebuild thinking its to old and > needs to be removed. This is a big issue. > > If its a seperate tree where only people who know the rules of the tree > work, its more likely to stay consistant and not have stuff removed that > shouldn't be.
How about an additional set of rights for enterprise/stable ebuilds in the current tree? If committer xyz doesn't have rights to the ebuild then they can't delete it. Of course they can always make a new non enterprise/stable ebuilds for the regular tree. Then the issue comes up is what if the committer makes an unauthorized enterprise/stable ebuild? One solution would be to have portage check the rights on the ebuild. If it doesn't have the additional set of rights then it's not an enterprise ebuild and it won't install. Brett -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
