On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:17:22AM -0500 or thereabouts, Brett Simpson wrote: > How about an additional set of rights for enterprise/stable ebuilds in the > current tree? If committer xyz doesn't have rights to the ebuild then they > can't delete it. Of course they can always make a new non enterprise/stable > ebuilds for the regular tree. > Then the issue comes up is what if the committer makes an unauthorized > enterprise/stable ebuild? One solution would be to have portage check the > rights on the ebuild. If it doesn't have the additional set of rights then > it's not an enterprise ebuild and it won't install.
These are all good suggestions and I think that the stable tree (if approved) will end up incorporating many of them down the road. However, the GLEP as it currently stands is mainly focused on establishing the base tree itself. I consider this a pre-requisite to all of the other suggestions that have been made. These suggestions are also better answered/implemented by the folks working on the QA project. So, basically, I want to walk before we run. --kurt
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
