On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:05:42PM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 20:37, Jon Portnoy wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:20:45AM +0000, Stuart Herbert wrote: > > Content-Description: signed data > > > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 1:12 am, Jon Portnoy wrote: > > > > I think the FHS needs to stop wrecking a perfectly usable preexisting > > > > standard filesystem layout by introducing useless directories like > > > > /media (should be under /mnt) and /srv (should be under /var). > > > > > > I'm with you on /media. But I think /srv has merit. > > > > What does /srv give us that /var doesn't? > > It's worth reading the reasoning for its existence: > > http://bugs.freestandards.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16
I still don't agree that it's necessary when we already have /var. I think /var should be more widely used and accepted with a broader definition than a new root-level directory. -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
