On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 04:14, Drake Wyrm wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:07:12PM -0500, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Donnie Berkholz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am I wrong in assuming that the people responsible for FHS has already > > > had this discussion? > > > > Fortunately we don't blindly follow the lead of others, but instead we > > think for ourselves. While their discussion is useful as a reference, we > > need to agree with their decision before implementing it. > > Absolutely! Let us discuss this. > > But better would have been for us to discuss this when the folks at > freestandards.org were discussing it. If it's such a bad idea, then > maybe it should have been kept out of the standard. This is one of those > "voice your opinion when it counts" sort of things. Gentoo Linux aims > toward LSB (and therefore FHS) compliance. There is a difference between > "deferring decision-making to others" and "blindly following the lead of > others". Perhaps, though, Gentoo could join some of these working groups > and open a few `liaison' projects thereto.
This is a great idea. Any volunteers? I don't have the time for it right now. Donnie
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
