On Saturday 15 January 2005 20:47, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
(B> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 20:39:25 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(B>
(B> wrote:
(B> | maillog: 14/01/2005-18:42:53(-0500): Mike Frysinger types
(B> |
(B> | > portage doesnt support USE based SLOTs
(B> |
(B> | Why does gcc have a multislot USE flag then? I already checked that it
(B> | doesn't work... or maybe it does... after updating the cache?
(B>
(B> Because Mike thinks no-one's going to notice that he's doing horrid
(B> cache breaking things.
(B
(BNot that I condone breaking the rules at all but, for the record, the only
(Bthing that dynamic SLOTs of any kind breaks at the moment is emerge's
(B--pretend output. I don't know if gcc's (mis-)use of dynamic SLOTs falls into
(Bthis category but, some packages simply require this functionality so it's
(Bnot always frowned upon. Having said that, if there is a way to stay within
(Bthe current set of rules, please do so. :)
(B
(BRegards,
(BJason Stubbs
(B
(B--
([email protected] mailing list
