On Saturday 15 January 2005 07:03 am, Jason Stubbs wrote:
(B> I don't know if gcc's (mis-)use of dynamic SLOTs falls
(B> into this category but, some packages simply require this functionality so
(B> it's not always frowned upon. Having said that, if there is a way to stay
(B> within the current set of rules, please do so. :)
(B
(Bthe toolchain does break this rule horribly ... and i coded all occurrences in
(Bgcc/binutils/glibc that does this ...
(B
(Bhowever, this falls into basically two categories ... large majority of people
(Bwill never use these and thus the cache / SLOT stays the way it's always
(Bbeen ... the other category is people who need cross-compiling NOW ...
(Bportage does not support the SLOTing ive outlined as a requirement (there are
(Bplans to resolve this, but none in a timely fashion ... i.e. tomorrow)
(B-mike
(B
(B--
([email protected] mailing list
