On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 13:11 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:59:52 +0100 Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | No, a version bump of vim-plugin-1.2.eclass to vim-plugin-1.3.eclass. > | So if you accidenally break something I can revert to 1.2 withou doing > | weird cvs-fu and overlay hacks. > > Weird cvs-fu? Hardly... cvs log and cvs diff aren't exactly difficult. For devs. What about broken stuff on the user side of things?
> No need to stick all sorts of weirdness into portage just because a few > people are too lazy to read the cvs docs. Once you know how to use it, > cvs is a lot simpler than trying to manually diff dozens of files. Ok, but it still doesn't solve the problem of mutating eclasses.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
