On Wednesday 19 January 2005 19:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 19 January 2005 12:35 pm, Alexander Mieland wrote: > > Perhaps it would be better to copy the emerge.log to /tmp? > > please god no
WHY not? Everyone seems to only can say no and not to make some suggestions. > > Otherwise I must put the user into the portage group to run basc. > > how critical is emerge.log to the basc system ? cannot it simply be > an option to the user ? some people wouldnt mind adding basc to the > portage group, others (as you can see) are quite adamant about it > never happening :) -mike the complete project BAS/c is build on this buildtime-database. This was the generally idea behind this whole project. To provide a really special feature to any user. The ability to determine how long a merge of a never installed before package could take. For this we've choosen the same system as LFS. LFS works with the "SBU" wich stands for the factor how long a package would compile in comparison with the compiletime of bash. The GU is *our* factor which uses gcc to calculate these GUs for the packages. But hey, sure, we can also take every other package or sourcecode to determine this GU. We've chossen gcc, because this is on really *every* gentoo-system installed and big enough to get an accurate GU. Perhaps we can create a little benchmark-program which will be compiled when basc was run for the first time. This could also be an idea. -- http://de.gentoo-wiki.com Alexander Mieland (aka dma147) http://www.gentoo-stats.org Registered Linux-User #249600 http://www.php-programs.de GnuGPG-ID: 209D65B5 http://www.affen-in-not.de www.php-programs.de/dma147.asc
pgpmOmJkwfAZ8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
